Configure each audit programme
Create Departments, Queues and Worktypes from a sample upload. Map Case ID, created date, analyst email, visible fields and optional routing Skillsets, then control whether self-QC is permitted.
Move from manual samples and fragmented scorecards to one controlled system for audit selection, checklist execution, error insight, processor feedback and dispute resolution.
QualityFlow connects configuration, audit execution and the response workflow so scores and improvement actions share one source of truth.
Create Departments, Queues and Worktypes from a sample upload. Map Case ID, created date, analyst email, visible fields and optional routing Skillsets, then control whether self-QC is permitted.
Upload checklist lines and configure Yes, No and Not Applicable responses, mandatory comments, scoring weights, error categories, error types and critical or non-critical severity.
Scores follow checklist outcomes automatically. Weighted results total consistently, and a configured critical error can set the overall quality score to zero.
Upload production data and set a minimum count or percentage. Add categorical, per-value or numeric threshold criteria; generate the closest valid sample, download it or push it to a compatible Worktype.
Assign audits directly or route by Department, Queue, Worktype and Skillset. Exclusive ownership, timers, interruption handling and Start QA controls protect audit integrity and AHT.
Capture Pass, Fail or Feedback, severity, error category and comments. Worktype policy controls whether all results—or only Fail and Feedback outcomes—are emailed.
Analysts see their results and quality performance. Fail and Feedback outcomes require acknowledgement or a dispute, with reminders for outstanding responses.
Quality managers review evidence, edit the underlying audit where needed, recalculate the authoritative score and errors, then uphold, reject or adjust the result with visible comments.
Role-based reports filter by Department, Queue, Worktype, Supervisor and Resource, while detailed audit, checklist, error and response data can be downloaded to Excel.
Move beyond a headline score to the patterns that tell leaders what to fix first.
Sample, audit, communicate, resolve and learn without losing the history behind the final score.
Minimum sample rules and additional criteria shape the closest valid audit population.
Checklist responses, scores, errors, severity and comments create a consistent result.
Processors receive actionable outcomes while managers control disputed final results.
Leaders focus calibration, process fixes and coaching where they will matter most.
All prices exclude applicable taxes. USD amounts shown on the main pricing page use the configurable website conversion rate.
14 days, 10 QA auditors or analysts, 2 managers/admins, 1 Department and 2 Worktypes.
One-time guided pilot for 4–6 weeks, up to 15 QA auditors and 3 managers/admins.
Per QA auditor/month. Managers or Admins are ₹2,000/month; ₹60,000 minimum monthly billing.
Dedicated deployment, environment and commercial terms for enterprise requirements.
For USD pricing and the full commercial comparison, visit the Praevexa pricing section.
Yes. QualityFlow is a separate application with its own organization, users, data and subscription. It can audit data produced by any upstream system.
Yes. Users can add multiple categorical or numeric rules. QualityFlow fulfils the criteria while keeping the result at or above the minimum and as close to it as possible.
Only when Allow Self QC is explicitly enabled for that Worktype. It is disabled by default.
The processor can acknowledge or dispute it. A manager can review and edit the audit, finalise the outcome, and publish comments and recalculated results.
No. Registration begins the 14-day free trial without asking for card details.